Onions are not the only thing with Layers!

I was sitting on my couch the other day watching one of the most infamous movies of all time with my children. The movie I am certain that many of you remember. During the movie there is a point when they talk about how “Onions have layers” and it got me thinking. Yes, that movie was Shrek and no this is not a pitch for the upcoming Shrek 4.

Like onions, all mortgage loans have layers. The layers are risk layers. Every file that we touch or work on is evaluated by the amount of risk to the investor. Risk is evaluated on several different ways. An underwriter has to be comfortable with the level of risk in order to approve the file. These layers can be described the following way: 1) Credit 2) Collateral 3) Capacity and 4) Compensating Factors.

Credit – Credit is more than a score. The score does make up the first level of assessment. If you do not have a score that meets the minimum requirement for the program you are done before you begin. However, what if you do have a score that is high enough to qualify for the loan program. Does that mean it is a done deal at that point? Credit has several components that we must go over to make sure that a consumer not only meets the requirement for score but credit as well. Some of these factors are:

• # of trade lines open and rating current – A trade line is an open account such as a credit card, and auto loan, a mortgage note, and installment debt or even a lease. These trade lines must remain open and most be rated to the current date. Some people have old credit cards that they never actively closed that have not reported in months. This shows the lender that you have the ability to open and maintain credit and when you have done so for several different types of credit it will help establish a solid score. They do go hand and hand. However if you have a 700 score and only one open trade line that is a small credit card open for 5 months this will not qualify. Although the score is high there has been little time for you to make a mistake and the low limit is a low risk for the credit card company. This would be insufficient credit.
• Several Open Collections – FHA specifically looks at the last twelve months of credit to see how you are doing now. There are cases that the scores are qualifying scores but a client has many open collections for semi large amounts. If this is not in the last twelve months the underwriter might require them to be paid especially anything over $1000 or so. If they are in the last twelve months and there is more than one you most likely will not qualify for the loan. If it is only one then you will have to write a suitable explanation and it will be left to the underwriters judgment. The only exception to this rule is Medical collections.
• Open Tax Liens or Judgments – Any of these items will have to be paid no matter what. They will also be further evaluated to see when they occurred what it is and why. Remember they are trying to see if there is any recurring behavior patterns of unpaid debts without explanations that make sense or situations you could not have predicted.

Collateral – is based on how much you are putting down on the property you are buying or the amount of equity you have in your current home. The larger the down payment the lower the risk. Anything less than 20% down requires Mortgage Insurance. Mortgage Insurance is designed to cover the investor on their losses in the even that the consumer forecloses. FHA is a Government insured loan and is designed to have a limited down payment so generally the collateral portion for FHA borrowers is usually not considered a strength of the file as a whole.

Capacity – This is the consumers ability to repay the debt. This is largely based on your debt to income ratio. However, capacity can be broken down further and commonly is:

• Time on the Job – If you are in a new industry where you get tips, overtime, bonus, commission or any other special compensation that you did not receive at your previous job they may not include this income. This could have a dramatic impact on the qualifications.
• Work History – I have had situations where the borrower had many jobs and this spooked the investor. I had to make up for spotty job history but accenting the positive factors of the loan.
• Self Employed Income Decreasing Year over Year – many loan officers take a two year average and that is the way that we are taught if and only if the income is steady and or increasing. In the event the income is decreasing year over year we use the current year only and we must make sure that the decline is not severe.

There are other items on capacity that we may look at in the layering of the risk but for time and length purposes that is all that we will discuss here.

Compensating Factors -Any factors that decrease the layers or levels of risk in the file. Some compensating factors may include but are not limited to:

• Assets
• 401K
  
• Long time on same job
• Reserves after down payment (not an FHA Requirement but considered a compensating factor)
• Low Debt to Income
• own funds to close not gift

The following Illustration is one that I have always used to give myself a visual of all the information above. Then I would rate each section 1-10 and determine how to present the strengths and minimize the exposure of the weaknesses.

Although overly simplified the graph shows that Credit, Collateral and Capacity are the focal points or base of the triangle. If any one of them are not very strong it is up to the supporting arms or Compensating factors to make up the difference. In order to do so the compensating factors have to make sense and be supportive to the overall structure of the file.

Ultimately the layers of risk will make or break your file. The goal of a loan officer should be to package the file in the best manner possible to make sure the underwriter sees why this is a good file. If someone has a high debt to income (Capacity) then it is essential that they are strong in credit and collateral and it is a bonus if they have compensating factors such as reserves. When borrowers want to do down payment assistance programs they are adding layers to the file. When you increase the layers or levels of risk you create a greater chance for error or decline. It is imperative that as you increase the risk you have supporting compensating factors that help to justify the risk an investor may take on you. As a consumer you can work toward this. Set yourself up for success. Decrease the layers that your file has and maximize your three C’s. This will help you to get a loan in today’s economy.

In conclusion, it is all about risk or layers. You want to give as many reasons to the investor to buy your loan as you can. I understand that it is hard to fire on all cylinders all the time and that is why Compensating factors play a huge roll. If you know that you have lower credit, don’t make a ton of money, and have limited down payment then you have to understand that you may be asked for several items. If you want to ask for down payment assistance you have to take a step back and be the investor. The question is why do I want to give my money to this person? Our job is to assist you in answering that question for the investor.

As always thank you for reading.

25% Gross Income. Don’t become a Jones!

When we set out on our home search we often think of a lot of things but rarely do we really analyze our budget totally. For many years Conventional Lending and Conventional Wisdom would tell you that your Housing payment Taxes and Insurance should not exceed 28%. Government Lending would set that standard over the years at 31%.

What do the Experts Say? In the book Total Money Makeover by Dave Ramsey he suggests that 25% is a great number to shoot for.

So what do these percentages mean? Debt to income is a measure of your debt versus your income. In this case the debt that we are talking about is your total housing responsibility. The income is your Gross Monthly Income not what you take home to live on.

Let’s Look at Example – Borrower A makes $8,000 per month Gross Income. Their Future Housing Payment will be $2,700 out the door. Their Debt to income in this case would be 2700/8000 = 34%. Based on conventional wisdom or even the number for government lending this would be higher than we would like to see. However, it is very common that this is acceptable through the automated underwriting engines. In fact I have seen ratios that are in the high 30′s and low 40′s make it through the system. In this example it would be advisable to have a payment that does not exceed $2500 on the government side and $2240 on the traditional conventional thought. According to Dave Ramsey $2,000 would be the max and I tend to agree with him.However, if I insisted on this I would be out of business!

Why are high ratios bad? Just take a look at the numbers as a whole. Going back to Borrower A. Borrower A represents a family of five. They like most families have expenses like daycare, food, insurance, cell phones, and you know the rest. So let’s mock an expense report.

Gross Monthly Income $8000 in a 30 % tax Bracket leaves the take home pay at $5600 per month.

$5,600 – $2,700 Housing – $800 Food – $500 in Auto Loans – $800 in Daycare conservatively = $800 remaining for all the everyday life expenses. It would be impossible to not use a credit card. How could you save for retirement, Christmas, incidentals etc.

Same Example: $5,600 – $2,000 Housing – $2,100 = $1500 which would be better.

So why do we not all buy with a 25% housing ratio? The Jones’. We get so caught up in the need to have a home like our friends. Facing the fact that we simply may not be able to afford a home is just to difficult. We, as a society, have not been taught about the numbers. I realize that some wise individual may read this and say you did not mention the tax benefits of home ownership. You are making a lot of assumptions on net income as they have three dependents, 2106 expenses, and a whole slough of write-offs. I understand that. I also know that I did not include many of the incidentals that we come across or even mention vacation. I simply want to illustrate a point that may get us to challenge ourselves to look deep into our finances. Owning a home is awesome. Living to service the home is not. When you are stressed each month about whether or not you will be able to pay by the first your whole life is affected.

Please consider your entire budget and consult a CPA before you even look at homes – The reason that I say this is simple. If I go to the local lots and test drive a 2010 Range Rover and then I realize that to have a life I would have to buy a base model pickup truck disappointment would overtake me.

My Job as your professional consultant for Mortgage is to lay out the facts – I want to make certain that I set you up for financial success not only a mortgage. I wish that I had been set down and taught these very basic principles before I entered the work world and housing market.

The principles out-lined here are not my own. They are a collaboration of wisdom that has been passed on to me over time and through trial and error.They are opinion. I have seen some great devastation and continue to see situations that are less than ideal and always will. Free will is awesome we are all given the opportunity to decide what is right and wrong for ourselves. I hope that you have enjoyed the material.